From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING in block layer triggered in 3.17-rc3
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:19:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140909011945.GD11706@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1409081335450.1433-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 01:42:44PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > This looks like a nasty hack. In theory the QUEUE_FLAG_INIT_DONE should
> > be unset on blk_unregister_queue() to match the teardown; it's only
> > accident it isn't. del_gendisk() in sd_remove() is supposed to tear a
> > lot of queue stuff down.
>
> It's not clear what the operative assumptions are. The comment in
> blk_register_queue() implies that bypass is active only because it was
> set up that way when the queue was created. The fact that
> blk_unregister_queue() doesn't call blk_queue_bypass_start() seems to
> support this view -- although it could also be a simple oversight.
>
> Hopefully Tejun can clear this iup.
Maintaining the initial bypass till queue registration is an
optimization because shutting down a fully functional queue is a
costly operation and there are drivers which set and destroy queues
repeatedly while probing, so, yeah, it's really a special case for
when the queue is being registered for the first time.
> > Your hack seems to indicate that this doesn't work on the add->del->add
> > transtion of a gendisk.
>
> Indeed, it does not work.
As such, the change you suggested makes perfect sense to me. Why
wouldn't it work?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 17:45 WARNING in block layer triggered in 3.17-rc3 Alan Stern
2014-09-07 10:43 ` Ming Lei
2014-09-07 22:59 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2014-09-08 14:51 ` Alan Stern
2014-09-08 15:05 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2014-09-08 15:51 ` James Bottomley
2014-09-08 16:11 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
2014-09-08 17:42 ` Alan Stern
2014-09-09 1:19 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-09-09 15:08 ` Alan Stern
2014-09-09 15:17 ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-09 15:50 ` [PATCH] Block: fix unbalanced bypass-disable in blk_register_queue Alan Stern
2014-09-09 16:43 ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-09 18:32 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140909011945.GD11706@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox