From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932462AbaIIQAG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:00:06 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:38767 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753617AbaIIQAE (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:00:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:59:54 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Adrian Hunter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , Alexander Yarygin , Anton Blanchard , Christian Borntraeger , Corey Ashford , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Jean Pihet , Jiri Olsa , Kyle McMartin , Michael Ellerman , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/13] perf/core improvements and fixes Message-ID: <20140909155954.GL2773@kernel.org> References: <1410211089-28668-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> <540EBED4.70900@intel.com> <20140909131239.GJ2773@kernel.org> <20140909145449.GB19536@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140909145449.GB19536@gmail.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:54:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:48:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > > > It looks like I reposted older versions by mistake on 31 July. > > > Very sorry :-( > > > The originals were changed as described here: > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140621020918615 > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140618721010170 > > No problem, the good thing is that we're almost getting it all > > in. I'll rework the branch and resubmit, Ingo, is that OK with > > you? [...] > Yeah, that's perfectly OK. > > [...] Or have you already pulled and we should instead send a > > patch on top, fixing the problem? > I pulled it locally then unpulled as it didn't pass my (very > simple) tests and it looked like there's something fishy going > on. Yeah, I should've tested this more, will make sure I test these things this time. Having a requirement that for each new feature we need an entry in 'perf test' and/or in make -C tools/perf build-test seems a bit harsh, but would be ideal, hook that to 'git request-pull' and this would hopefully only happen every celestial aligment nights or so :-\ - Arnaldo