From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752152AbaIIS64 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:58:56 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:57801 "EHLO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751004AbaIIS6y (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:58:54 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 2GoF1qye8OfNK9937E+RxelF7v8YfUN8wIo34dH5HeL2 1410289133 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:58:52 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" , Helge Deller , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] parisc/uapi: Add definition of TIOC[SG]RS485 Message-ID: <20140909185852.GA7037@kroah.com> References: <1410285991-24833-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> <20140909184318.GA6231@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:46:48PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hello Greg. > > I have just resend one for sparc. Are we sure that we prefer the > macros instead of using the same value on all arches? Why would using a macro preclude the value being the same on all arches?