From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Bowens,
Alan" <Alan.Bowens@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts: Add of node type to the i2c table
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:08:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140911110829.GA5149@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5411693A.3050300@itdev.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3293 bytes --]
Funny timing. I am just reviewing the series from Lee and also stumbled
over modaliases, too...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:19:54AM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote:
> On 11/09/14 09:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > To expand on what Sjoerd already said and just to be sure everyone is on the
> > same page.
> >
> > The problem is that right now the driver reports the following modalias:
> >
> > # cat /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-8/8-004b/modalias
> > i2c:maxtouch
> >
> > but if you look at the module information, that is not a valid alias:
> >
> > # modinfo atmel_mxt_ts | grep alias
> > alias: i2c:mXT224
> > alias: i2c:atmel_mxt_tp
> > alias: i2c:atmel_mxt_ts
> > alias: i2c:qt602240_ts
> > alias: of:N*T*Catmel,maxtouch*
> >
> > which means that udev/kmod can't load the module automatically based on the
> > alias information.
> >
> > The aliases are filled by both MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mxt_id) and
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mxt_of_match) so after Sjoerd's patch:
> >
> > # cat /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-8/8-004b/modalias
> > i2c:maxtouch
> >
> > # modinfo atmel_mxt_ts | grep alias
> > alias: i2c:mXT224
> > alias: i2c:maxtouch
> > alias: i2c:atmel_mxt_tp
> > alias: i2c:atmel_mxt_ts
> > alias: i2c:qt602240_ts
> >
> > which matches the reported uevent so the module will be auto-loaded.
> >
> > This is because the I2C subsystem hardcodes i2c:<client->name>, if you look at
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:
> >
> > /* uevent helps with hotplug: modprobe -q $(MODALIAS) */
> > static int i2c_device_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
> > {
> > ...
> > if (add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=%s%s",
> > I2C_MODULE_PREFIX, client->name))
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > I've looked at Lee's series and AFAICT that remains the same so I second
> > Sjoerd that module auto-loading will continue to be broken.
I think the above code in the i2c core needs a fix. Will have a closer
look after lunch.
> The i2c aliases are a bit confusing. The original device the driver was
> written for was called qt602240, which was renamed by Atmel to mXT224 when
> the chip series was called "maXTouch". The driver now actually supports
> many other chips which aren't listed (more than 20 devices that I've
> personally tested). I could add them all, but it would be an extremely long
> list. It may be preferable to use the generic name maXTouch.
This is probably true for some more I2C devices. Like RTCs being
compatible or, most prominent, EEPROMS. I don't want to have a list of
all vendors producing 24c02s if they are all compatible. If generic
entries are frowned upon, I'd agree on a "first come, first served" policy:
Somebody provides one compatible-property with the vendor which happens
to be on that board, and the others have to reuse that
compatible-property since they are, well, compatible.
> So I think the sensible thing to do here would be to add "maxtouch" to the
> i2c list to fix the module autoload issue.
This is a workaround. It would make sense, however, to add it because we
want to support i2c_board_info structures.
Regards,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 7:52 [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts: Add of node type to the i2c table Sjoerd Simons
2014-09-09 10:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-09 10:29 ` Nick Dyer
2014-09-09 10:54 ` Sjoerd Simons
2014-09-10 9:28 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-11 8:00 ` Sjoerd Simons
2014-09-11 8:38 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-11 9:19 ` Nick Dyer
2014-09-11 9:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-11 11:08 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-09-11 11:24 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-11 11:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-09-11 11:41 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-09-11 12:24 ` Nick Dyer
2014-09-09 12:36 ` Nick Dyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140911110829.GA5149@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=Alan.Bowens@atmel.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk \
--cc=sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox