From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753380AbaILHhe (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 03:37:34 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:56863 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752643AbaILHhd (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 03:37:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:37:29 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbueso@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] locktorture: Support rwsems Message-ID: <20140912073729.GK346@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1410493224-3312-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <1410496890.2166.11.camel@linux-t7sj.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1410496890.2166.11.camel@linux-t7sj.site> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:41:30PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > We can easily do so with our new reader lock support. Just an arbitrary > design default: readers have higher (5x) critical region latencies than > writers: 50 ms and 10 ms, respectively. > Nice, could you copy/paste this into a rwlock test as well?