From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, jdelvare@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de,
dianders@chromium.org, sjg@chromium.org,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, max.schwarz@online.de,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, iivanov@mm-sol.com,
jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com,
bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
skuribay@pobox.com, christian.ruppert@abilis.com,
Romain.Baeriswyl@abilis.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-designware: Intel BayTrail PMIC I2C bus support
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:55:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140915165545.GA2039@pathfinder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54168DE2.8020303@st.com>
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >+ err = dev->acquire_ownership(dev->dev);
> Have you considered using hwspinlocks instead?
No, I've not used it before but it looks applicable here. I'll take a look.
> >@@ -212,6 +259,25 @@ static int dw_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >
> >+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SHARED_CONTROLLER)
> >+ if (dev->shared_host)
> >+ adap->algo = &i2c_sc_algo;
> >+
> >+ r = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(adap);
> >+ if (r) {
> >+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failure adding adapter\n");
> >+ return r;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ if (dev->shared_host)
> >+ pm_runtime_forbid(&pdev->dev);
> >+ else {
> >+ pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 1000);
> >+ pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> >+ pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
> >+ pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> >+ }
> >+#else
> Why do you put all this under config flags?
So that this additional code only compiles for this very specific
implementation.
> >@@ -268,7 +334,11 @@ static int dw_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> > struct dw_i2c_dev *i_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > clk_prepare_enable(i_dev->clk);
> >- i2c_dw_init(i_dev);
> >+
> >+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SHARED_CONTROLLER)
> >+ if (!i_dev->shared_host)
> >+#endif
> Putting this under config flag should not be needed.
>
> And even not under config flags, why don't you re-initialize your
> device in case of resume?
Because the device is already being managed by hardware, not the OS.
David Box
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-12 17:36 [PATCH] i2c-designware: Intel BayTrail PMIC I2C bus support David E. Box
2014-09-15 6:57 ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-09-15 16:55 ` David E. Box [this message]
2014-09-16 9:44 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 10:53 ` Jacob Pan
2014-09-16 10:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-17 4:01 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-09-17 11:02 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-09-23 18:40 ` [PATCH V2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail " David E. Box
2014-09-23 19:00 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-23 19:58 ` David E. Box
2014-09-25 9:47 ` Maxime Ripard
[not found] ` <20141007191420.GA25126@pathfinder>
2014-10-09 12:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-11-11 11:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-11 17:11 ` David E. Box
2014-11-11 11:50 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-12-02 0:09 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] i2c-designware: Baytrail bus locking driver David E. Box
2014-12-02 0:09 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] i2c-designware: Add i2c bus locking support David E. Box
2014-12-03 16:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-12-04 18:49 ` David E. Box
2014-12-04 7:59 ` Jarkko Nikula
2014-12-04 18:42 ` David E. Box
2015-01-13 9:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-14 18:15 ` David E. Box
2014-12-02 0:09 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail PMIC I2C bus support David E. Box
2014-12-03 16:10 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-12-04 19:11 ` David E. Box
2014-12-06 3:51 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] i2c-designware: Baytrail bus locking driver Shinya Kuribayashi
2015-01-15 9:12 ` [PATCH V4 0/2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail pmic i2c bus support David E. Box
2015-01-26 11:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 9:12 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] i2c-designware: Add i2c bus locking support David E. Box
2015-01-22 14:22 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-15 9:12 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail PMIC I2C bus support David E. Box
2015-01-22 14:28 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-22 20:48 ` David E. Box
2015-01-23 9:32 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-01-23 14:18 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140915165545.GA2039@pathfinder \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Romain.Baeriswyl@abilis.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=christian.ruppert@abilis.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.schwarz@online.de \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=skuribay@pobox.com \
--cc=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).