From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix end_of_stack() fn and location of stack canary for archs using STACK_GROWSUP
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:37:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140916023736.49db964e@as> (raw)
Aaron Tomlin recently posted patches [1] to enable checking the stack canary on
every task switch. Looking at the canary code, I realized that every arch
(except ia64, which adds some space for register spill above the stack) shares a
definition of end_of_stack() that makes it the first long after the threadinfo.
For stacks that grow down, this low address is correct because the stack starts
at the end of the thread area and grows toward lower addresses. However, for
stacks that grow up, toward higher addresses, this is wrong. (The stack actually
grows away from the canary.) On these archs end_of_stack() should return the
address of the last long, at the highest possible address for the stack.
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/293
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
---
Compile tested only, with Aaron's patches applied and the new option
CONFIG_SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK they add enabled. I have no way to test
this any further.
diff a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2610,7 +2610,11 @@ static inline void setup_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct
static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
+ return (unsigned long *)((unsigned long)task_thread_info(p) + THREAD_SIZE) - 1;
+#else
return (unsigned long *)(task_thread_info(p) + 1);
+#endif
}
#endif
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-16 7:37 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2014-09-19 11:21 ` [PATCH] Fix end_of_stack() fn and location of stack canary for archs using STACK_GROWSUP James Hogan
2014-09-19 13:34 ` Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140916023736.49db964e@as \
--to=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox