From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753128AbaIPKxb (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:53:31 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:40281 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752046AbaIPKxa (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:53:30 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,534,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="477839408" Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 03:53:27 -0700 From: Jacob Pan To: Mika Westerberg Cc: "David E. Box" , wsa@the-dreams.de, jdelvare@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de, dianders@chromium.org, sjg@chromium.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, maxime.coquelin@st.com, max.schwarz@online.de, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, iivanov@mm-sol.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com, andrew@lunn.ch, skuribay@pobox.com, christian.ruppert@abilis.com, Romain.Baeriswyl@abilis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-designware: Intel BayTrail PMIC I2C bus support Message-ID: <20140916035327.4d3d5555@ultegra> In-Reply-To: <20140916094449.GZ10854@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1410543367-6565-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <20140916094449.GZ10854@lahna.fi.intel.com> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:44:49 +0300 Mika Westerberg wrote: > Is this because we need to access the PMIC from host as well? I mean > from some PMIC driver (which driver btw)? > This is used by the X-Powers PMIC. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/1016 > Otherwise it would be best to just detect _SEM and return -ENODEV. Thanks, Jacob