From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: git rid of [sched_delayed] message for printk_deferred
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:35:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140916203510.GF1205@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140916111331.14303381@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue 16-09-14 11:13:31, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:42:52 +0200
> Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
>
> > commit 458df9fd hardcodes printk_deferred() to KERN_WARNING and inserts
> > the string "[sched_delayed] " before the actual message.
> > However it doesn't take into account the KERN_* prefix of the message,
> > that now ends up in the middle of the output:
> >
> > [sched_delayed] ^a4CE: hpet increased min_delta_ns to 20115 nsec
> >
> > Fix this by just getting rid of the "[sched_delayed] " scnprintf().
>
> I prefer the "[sched_delayed]" output. It lets us know that the output
> did not come out immediately, which is important sometimes during
> debugging. Otherwise it can confuse people, as printk is suppose to be
> a blocking write.
This is a common misconception about printk. It isn't a blocking write
for ten years or more. If there happens to be someone else printing to
console, the difference between printk() and printk_deferred() is
marginal - it used to be bigger when scheduler had its own buffer but these
days message is inserted in the kernel ring buffer immediately. That's why
I don't think the prefix is useful anymore.
> Can we instead fix the bug instead of nuking the output? That is, move
> the KERN_* prefix before the "[sched_delayed]" message? I don't think
> it would be that hard. If you want, I'll write that patch (probably
> take me 20 minutes at most), but I'm just coming back from medical
> leave so I prefer not to.
Glad to see you back! I'm not opposed to moving the prefix but it doesn't
seem worth the effort...
Honza
> > Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > index 1ce770687ea8..f85994b58934 100644
> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > @@ -1680,12 +1680,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
> > * The printf needs to come first; we need the syslog
> > * prefix which might be passed-in as a parameter.
> > */
> > - if (in_sched)
> > - text_len = scnprintf(text, sizeof(textbuf),
> > - KERN_WARNING "[sched_delayed] ");
> > -
> > - text_len += vscnprintf(text + text_len,
> > - sizeof(textbuf) - text_len, fmt, args);
> > + text_len = vscnprintf(text, sizeof(textbuf), fmt, args);
> >
> > /* mark and strip a trailing newline */
> > if (text_len && text[text_len-1] == '\n') {
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-14 5:09 Weird character in kernel message Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-14 5:54 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-14 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-15 16:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-16 10:55 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-16 14:42 ` [PATCH] printk: git rid of [sched_delayed] message for printk_deferred Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-16 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-16 15:20 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-16 19:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-16 19:17 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-16 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-16 20:35 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2014-09-16 21:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-16 21:22 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-16 21:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-17 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-17 14:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-17 22:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-18 0:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-18 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-20 5:12 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-20 15:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-20 16:34 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-20 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-20 16:10 ` Joe Perches
2014-09-20 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-09-20 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-20 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-24 11:01 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-24 11:26 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-24 11:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-24 15:12 ` Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-24 15:20 [PATCH] " Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-09-24 15:35 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140916203510.GF1205@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox