From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754091AbaIQBoW (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:44:22 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:43701 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752714AbaIQBoU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:44:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:44:10 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Hanjun Guo Cc: Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Rutland , Olof Johansson , Grant Likely , Will Deacon , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Liviu Dudau , Lv Zheng , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Daniel Lezcano , Robert Moore , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Jon Masters , Mark Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Graeme Gregory , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Message-ID: <20140917014410.GC31214@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1410530416-30200-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1410530416-30200-19-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1410530416-30200-19-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:16PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > +Common _DSD bindings should be submitted to ASWG to be included in the > +document :- > + > +http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm How are individuals/companies who aren't UEFI members supposed to do this? Aren't there IP issues involved in taking submissions from non-members? > +No code shall be accepted into the kernel unless it complies with the released > +standards from UEFI ASWG. If there are features missing from ACPI to make it > +function on a platform, ECRs should be submitted to ASWG and go through the > +approval process. Similar question here. Is the expectation that all ARM vendors will become UEFI contributors? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org