Re: [PATCH] rcu: unify boost and kthread priorities

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 07:45:57PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 10:17 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:49:03PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > There's a reference to CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_PRIO in
> > > tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/doc/TREE_RCU-kconfig.txt. It needs
> > > updating too, doesn't it?
> > 
> > Good catch!
> > 
> > Also the one in tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE03.
> 
> >From my local perl monstrosity:
> 	# ...  and Paul McKenney's rcutorture stuff (v3.14-rc+)
> 	if ($blob->[1] =~ /tools\/testing\/selftests\/rcutorture\/configs\/.*/) {
> 
> Ie, I've made that script ignore all references to Kconfig macros below
> tools/testing/selftest/rcutorture/configs. Is that too crude?

It would not hurt to check the files that appear in the CFLIST files:

	tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST
	tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/CFLIST

These files drive the torture-test kernel configurations.

That said, yes, there are sometimes some obsolete or deprecated
Kconfig parameters in these files because some systems need them.

							Thanx, Paul

> > Fixed both, thank you!
> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
>