From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@linux.intel.com, brice.goglin@gmail.com,
bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/6] sched: eliminate "DIE" domain level when NUMA present
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:33:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917223316.FCEAF8FB@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917223310.026BCC2C@viggo.jf.intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
The "DIE" topology level is currently defined like this:
static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_cpu_mask(int cpu)
{
return cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
}
But that makes very little sense on a NUMA system since
the lowest-domain NUMA node is guaranteed to be essentially
the same as this level.
We leave this for systems that are !CONFIG_NUMA and that
might need a top-level domain.
This also keeps us from having screwy topologies when the
smallest NUMA node is only _part_ of the die.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---
b/kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff -puN kernel/sched/core.c~die-is-NUMA-based-and-screwed-up kernel/sched/core.c
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c~die-is-NUMA-based-and-screwed-up 2014-09-17 15:28:57.867588315 -0700
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c 2014-09-17 15:28:57.873588591 -0700
@@ -6141,7 +6141,9 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_leve
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
{ cpu_coregroup_mask, cpu_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
#endif
+#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
{ cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
+#endif
{ NULL, },
};
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 22:33 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] fix topology for multi-NUMA-node CPUs Dave Hansen
2014-09-17 22:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] topology: rename topology_core_cpumask() to topology_package_cpumask() Dave Hansen
2014-09-17 22:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] x86: introduce cpumask specifically for the package Dave Hansen
2014-09-18 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-17 22:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] x86: use package_map instead of core_map for sysfs Dave Hansen
2014-09-17 22:33 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2014-09-18 17:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] sched: eliminate "DIE" domain level when NUMA present Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-17 22:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sched: keep MC domain from crossing nodes OR packages Dave Hansen
2014-09-17 22:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sched: consolidate config options Dave Hansen
2014-09-18 17:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-19 19:15 ` Dave Hansen
2014-09-19 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-18 7:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] fix topology for multi-NUMA-node CPUs Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <CAOjmkp8EGO0jicmdO=p6ATHz-hUJmWb+xoBLjOdLBUwwGzyhhg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-22 15:54 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140917223316.FCEAF8FB@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox