From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: micky_ching@realsil.com.cn
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rogerable@realtek.com, wei_wang@realsil.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: rtsx: fix PM suspend for 5227 & 5249
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:53:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140918045316.GB8740@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411004156-9057-1-git-send-email-micky_ching@realsil.com.cn>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, micky_ching@realsil.com.cn wrote:
> From: Micky Ching <micky_ching@realsil.com.cn>
>
> Fix rts5227&5249 failed send buffer cmd after suspend,
> PM_CTRL3 should reset before send any buffer cmd after suspend.
> Otherwise, buffer cmd will failed, this will lead resume fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Micky Ching <micky_ching@realsil.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/rts5227.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mfd/rts5249.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h | 1 +
> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
I think you'll find you just broke the build.
What happens when you compile these as modules?
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c b/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c
> index 9c8eec8..8222a31 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,27 @@ static int rts5227_extra_init_hw(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> return rtsx_pci_send_cmd(pcr, 100);
> }
>
> +int rts5227_pm_reset(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + /* init aspm */
> + err = rtsx_pci_update_cfg_byte(pcr, LCTLR, 0xFC, 0);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + /* reset PM_CTRL3 before send buffer cmd */
> + return rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, PM_CTRL3, 0x10, 0x00);
> +}
> +
> static int rts5227_optimize_phy(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> {
> + int err;
> +
> + err = rts5227_pm_reset(pcr);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> /* Optimize RX sensitivity */
> return rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, 0x00, 0xBA42);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> index 573de7b..0f1b0e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ static int rts5249_optimize_phy(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> {
> int err;
>
> + err = rts5227_pm_reset(pcr);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
I don't like this. Place rts52xx_pm_reset() somewhere more central.
Perhaps an inline function in the header would be better?
> err = rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, PHY_REG_REV,
> PHY_REG_REV_RESV | PHY_REG_REV_RXIDLE_LATCHED |
> PHY_REG_REV_P1_EN | PHY_REG_REV_RXIDLE_EN |
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
> index 07e4c2e..acc7a1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
> @@ -72,4 +72,5 @@ do { \
> pcr->ms_pull_ctl_disable_tbl = __device##_ms_pull_ctl_disable_tbl; \
> } while (0)
>
> +int rts5227_pm_reset(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr);
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> index 74346d5..b34fec8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> @@ -967,4 +967,16 @@ static inline u8 *rtsx_pci_get_cmd_data(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> return (u8 *)(pcr->host_cmds_ptr);
> }
>
> +static inline int rtsx_pci_update_cfg_byte(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, int addr,
> + u8 mask, u8 append)
> +{
> + int err;
> + u8 val;
> +
> + err = pci_read_config_byte(pcr->pci, addr, &val);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> + return pci_write_config_byte(pcr->pci, addr, (val & mask) | append);
> +}
> +
> #endif
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-18 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 1:35 [PATCH] mfd: rtsx: fix PM suspend for 5227 & 5249 micky_ching
2014-09-18 4:53 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-09-18 5:49 ` micky
2014-09-19 0:21 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-19 1:24 ` micky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-18 6:55 micky_ching
2014-10-06 21:05 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140918045316.GB8740@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=micky_ching@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=rogerable@realtek.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox