Re: [PATCH 3.17-rc5 ] scripts/sortextable: Suppress warning: ‘relocs_size’ may be used uninitialized

[Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@oracle.com>]

Hi Tim,

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:49:22PM -0600, tim.gardner@canonical.com wrote:
> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> 
> In file included from scripts/sortextable.c:194:0:
> scripts/sortextable.c: In function ‘main’:
> scripts/sortextable.h:176:3: warning: ‘relocs_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>    memset(relocs, 0, relocs_size);
>    ^
> scripts/sortextable.h:106:6: note: ‘relocs_size’ was declared here
>   int relocs_size;
>       ^
> In file included from scripts/sortextable.c:192:0:
> scripts/sortextable.h:176:3: warning: ‘relocs_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>    memset(relocs, 0, relocs_size);
>    ^
> scripts/sortextable.h:106:6: note: ‘relocs_size’ was declared here
>   int relocs_size;
>       ^
> 
> gcc 4.9.1
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@oracle.com>

> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> ---
> 
> Is gcc 4.9 dumber then 4.8 ? gcc 4.8 doesn't produce this warning.

It's an odd one - I don't see how relocs_size can be uninitialized when 
relocs is non-null.  Your fix looks fine to me though.

Jamie

>  scripts/sortextable.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/sortextable.h b/scripts/sortextable.h
> index 8fac3fd..ba87004 100644
> --- a/scripts/sortextable.h
> +++ b/scripts/sortextable.h
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ do_func(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, char const *const fname, table_sort_t custom_sort)
>  	Elf_Sym *sort_needed_sym;
>  	Elf_Shdr *sort_needed_sec;
>  	Elf_Rel *relocs = NULL;
> -	int relocs_size;
> +	int relocs_size = 0;
>  	uint32_t *sort_done_location;
>  	const char *secstrtab;
>  	const char *strtab;
> -- 
> 2.1.0
>