From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: x86, microcode: BUG: microcode update that changes x86_capability
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:53:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140918145328.0253f009@as> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541B2F33.8000002@amacapital.net>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:14:59 -0700
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On 09/18/2014 06:52 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > The new Haswell microcode update[1] removes the "hle" (hardware lock
> > elision) processor capability. And it is not cosmetic, either: Intel TSX
> > opcodes will cause an illegal opcode trap after the microcode update[2].
> >
> > This means cpu_info()->x86_capability becomes stale after the microcode
> > update.
> >
> > We could add logic to compute the new x86_capability after a microcode
> > update run, and OOPS the kernel if something too important (i.e. anything
> > the kernel uses) went away. Otherwise, refresh cpu_info()->x86_capability.
> >
> > Is that doable?
> >
> >
> > [1] sig 0x000306f2, pf mask 0x6f, 2014-09-03, rev 0x0029, size 28672
> > sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2014-07-03, rev 0x001c, size 21504
> > sig 0x00040651, pf mask 0x72, 2014-07-03, rev 0x001c, size 20480
> > sig 0x00040661, pf mask 0x32, 2014-07-03, rev 0x0012, size 23552
>
> This is HSD136, right? Do you have a link to where that ucode comes
> from? Does it have release notes?
>
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=24290&lang=eng
I can't find any release notes.
Haswell-EP is also affected, it appears:
http://techreport.com/news/26911/errata-prompts-intel-to-disable-tsx-in-haswell-early-broadwell-cpus
> >
> > [2] instantly segfaulting every running process using libpthread-2.19,
> > as well as any other users of Intel TSX.
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1370352
> >
> > And yes, this means we will kill support for microcode updates
> > outside of the initramfs/early-initramfs, at least in Debian,
> > and likely in Ubuntu.
> >
>
> Given that there is exactly one microcode update like this (at least of
> the sort that blows up userspace), I think that we should seriously
> consider blacklisting just this particular microcode update once
> userspace is running.
>
All future updates for these CPUs will have this problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-18 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 13:52 x86, microcode: BUG: microcode update that changes x86_capability Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-18 19:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-18 19:53 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2014-09-18 19:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-09-18 20:06 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 0:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 0:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-19 0:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-09-19 1:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-19 8:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-19 11:00 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 11:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-19 12:54 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-19 13:14 ` Josh Boyer
2014-09-19 13:37 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-19 15:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-19 16:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-19 16:54 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 16:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-23 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-24 14:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-24 15:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-24 17:45 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-24 17:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-24 18:59 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-24 19:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-25 8:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-25 8:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-25 11:36 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-25 12:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-25 14:40 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-25 14:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-25 15:30 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-25 15:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-25 16:41 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-25 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-25 17:09 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 13:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 14:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-19 17:22 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 22:35 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-29 11:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 9:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-19 16:11 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-22 0:37 ` Andi Kleen
2014-09-22 0:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-09-22 0:58 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140918145328.0253f009@as \
--to=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox