From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757603AbaISPMf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:12:35 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:41869 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756766AbaISPKL (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:10:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:34:14 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Jan Kara , Markus Trippelsdorf , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: git rid of [sched_delayed] message for printk_deferred Message-ID: <20140918173414.GU2840@worktop.localdomain> References: <20140916144252.GB32118@x4> <20140916111331.14303381@gandalf.local.home> <20140916203510.GF1205@quack.suse.cz> <20140916170709.73ef2993@gandalf.local.home> <20140916212250.GI1205@quack.suse.cz> <20140916173328.6306a5c2@gandalf.local.home> <20140917141816.GO2840@worktop.localdomain> <20140917102255.5cd03071@gandalf.local.home> <20140917223633.GE2848@worktop.localdomain> <20140917203135.6db2ee5e@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140917203135.6db2ee5e@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:31:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I totally didn't get what you wrote. :-) > We don't want to know if it got delayed, then the patch to remove that > print seems correct. Why would you not want to know that? Also was that the actual argument? Lemme go check the earlier emails -- I cannot find that argument in the first few emails. > But how did it get delayed if we don't know if it got delayed and > don't want to know? If you cannot prove something didn't happen it must have happened :-) > Are my meds still that strong??? Either that or I'm just incoherent, I get that while traveling.