From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, atomlin@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix end_of_stack() and location of stack canary for architectures using CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 06:58:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140920065810.794d6bbd@as> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-a3215fb47c7ecb814dc16815245db4f375841268@git.kernel.org>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 23:42:37 -0700
tip-bot for Chuck Ebbert <tipbot@zytor.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: a3215fb47c7ecb814dc16815245db4f375841268
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a3215fb47c7ecb814dc16815245db4f375841268
> Author: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:35:05 -0500
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:38:16 +0200
>
> sched: Fix end_of_stack() and location of stack canary for architectures using CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
>
> Aaron Tomlin recently posted patches to enable checking the
> stack canary on every task switch:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/293
>
> Looking at the canary code, I realized that every arch
> (except ia64, which adds some space for register spill
> above the stack) shares a definition of end_of_stack()
> that makes it the first long after the threadinfo.
>
> For stacks that grow down, this low address is correct
> because the stack starts at the end of the thread area
> and grows toward lower addresses. However, for stacks
> that grow up, toward higher addresses, this is wrong.
> (The stack actually grows away from the canary.)
>
> On these archs end_of_stack() should return the address
> of the last long, at the highest possible address for
> the stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> [metag]
> Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> Acked-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140919093505.62681e43@as
> [ Added comments to end_of_stack(). ]
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5c2c885..0e20a24 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2608,9 +2608,22 @@ static inline void setup_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct
> task_thread_info(p)->task = p;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Return the address of the first long before (or after,
> + * depending on the architecture's default stack growth
> + * direction) * a task's task_info structure, which is the
> + * kernel stack's last usable spot.
> + *
> + * This is the point of no return, if the stack grows
> + * beyond that position, we corrupt the task's state.
> + */
This comment you added is not correct for archs where the stack grows
up. The threadinfo is always at the lowest address on the stack in
every case. Instead of corrupting the thread info, a stack overflow
will corrupt whatever is on the next page after the stack if it grows
upward.
> static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
> + return (unsigned long *)((unsigned long)task_thread_info(p) + THREAD_SIZE) - 1;
> +#else
> return (unsigned long *)(task_thread_info(p) + 1);
> +#endif
> }
>
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-20 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-19 14:35 [PATCH V2] Fix end_of_stack() and location of stack canary for archs using STACK_GROWSUP Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-20 6:42 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix end_of_stack() and location of stack canary for architectures using CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP tip-bot for Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-20 11:58 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2014-09-20 14:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-20 17:45 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140920065810.794d6bbd@as \
--to=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).