From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753282AbaIVHnt (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:43:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13149 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752888AbaIVHnq (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:43:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:43:15 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@linux.intel.com, brice.goglin@gmail.com, bp@alien8.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: new topology for multi-NUMA-node CPUs Message-ID: <20140922074315.GE5366@x2.net.home> References: <20140918193334.C065EBCE@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20140919114529.GD5366@x2.net.home> <541C72A9.9090509@sr71.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <541C72A9.9090509@sr71.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:15:05AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 09/19/2014 04:45 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > > hmm... it would be also nice to test it with lscpu(1) from > > util-linux (but it uses maps rather than lists from cpu*/topology/). > > Here's the output with and with out Cluster-on-Die enabled. > > Everything looks OK to me. The cache size changes are what the CPU > actually tells us through CPUID leaves. Thanks Dave! Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com