From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754039AbaIVKwm (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:52:42 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:57121 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754010AbaIVKwj (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:52:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:52:36 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Belisko Marek Cc: Sebastian Reichel , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , Kumar Gala , Rob Landley , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] power: twl4030-madc-battery: Convert to iio consumer. Message-ID: <20140922105236.GH3290@leverpostej> References: <1394052739-8589-1-git-send-email-marek@goldelico.com> <1394052739-8589-2-git-send-email-marek@goldelico.com> <20140305232513.GA9542@earth.universe> <20140814210324.GA22572@earth.universe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:13:47PM +0100, Belisko Marek wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:52:52PM +0200, Belisko Marek wrote: > >> can you please take this series (I'll post update version with > >> removing debug code). Thanks. > > > > mh. I will not pull this with "(dis)charging-calibration-data" as > > DT property name without an ACK from the DT binding maintainers. > DT maintainers ping. Apologies for the delay. I will take a look at the bidning shortly. > > > > I would feel fine with pulling this when they are prefixed with > > "ti,". Otherwise the series looks good to me. > Why it should be prefixed by "ti"? Isn't enough to have "ti" prefix for driver > compatible property? Thanks. Because if we want to add a similar generic property, the names will clash. Ideally bindings should use prefixed properties by default -- those can be replaced with generic properties as commonality becomes apparent. Mark.