From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754422AbaIVOvR (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:51:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:34130 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754397AbaIVOvO (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:51:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:51:09 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , David Ahern , Milian Wolff , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf tools: Introduce perf_callchain_config() Message-ID: <20140922145109.GF32694@kernel.org> References: <1411229886-24390-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1411229886-24390-5-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20140922142510.GE18187@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140922142510.GE18187@krava.brq.redhat.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 01:18:05AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > +int perf_callchain_config(const char *var, const char *value) > > +{ > > + if (prefixcmp(var, "call-graph.")) > > + return 0; > > + var += 11; /* strlen("call-graph.") == 11 */ > should we use sizeof("call-graph.") - 1 instead ? Agreed, it should produce the same code and is more compact :-) - Arnaldo