From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
johan@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:35:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923073541.GM5237@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411414759-7056-2-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:39:18PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> Currently the I/O buffer is allocated part of the device status
> structure, potentially sharing the same cache line with other members
> in this structure.
>
> Allocate the buffer separately, to avoid the I/O operations corrupting
> the device status structure due to cache line sharing.
>
> Compiled tested only as I don't have access to hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> index e00f534..5f62f4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + vb->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (vb->buf == NULL) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto error;
This will cause a kref imbalance as you have a usb_put_dev in error,
but haven't done the get yet.
> + }
> +
> mutex_init(&vb->lock);
>
> vb->usb_dev = usb_get_dev(interface_to_usbdev(interface));
Here's the get.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-22 19:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: viperboard: cleanups and fix for cache line sharing Octavian Purdila
2014-09-22 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately Octavian Purdila
2014-09-23 7:35 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2014-09-23 7:38 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-23 7:47 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-24 10:12 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-24 10:28 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-24 12:00 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-24 12:26 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-24 12:34 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-09-24 12:34 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-22 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: viperboard: remove redundant OOM message and NULL pointer check Octavian Purdila
2014-09-24 10:13 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140923073541.GM5237@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox