linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] AHCI: Optimize single IRQ interrupt processing
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:27:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140924082713.7ddd718e@as> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140924130444.GA16555@htj.dyndns.org>

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:04:44 -0400
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hello, Alexander.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:42:15AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Hmmm... how does it affect single device operation tho?  It does make
> > > individual interrupt handling heavier, no?
> > 
> > I think it is difficult to assess "individual interrupt handling", since
> > it depends from both the hardware and device access pattern. On the system
> > I use the results are rather counter-intuitive: ahci_thread_fn() does not
> > show up in perf report at all, nor ahci_single_irq_intr(). While before
> > the change ahci_single_irq_intr() reported 0.00%.
> > 
> > But since the handling is split in two parts it is rather incorrect to
> > apply the same metric to the threaded context. Obviously, the threaded
> > handler is expected slowed down by other interrupts handlers, but the
> > whole system should benefit from it, which is exactly the aim of this
> > change.
> 
> Hmmm, how would the whole system benefit from it if there's only
> single device?  Each individual servicing of the interrupt does more
> now which includes scheduling which may end up adding to completion
> latency.
> 

I think he meant other, non-AHCI, interrupt handlers would benefit. A
good test of this patch might be to stream 10Gb ethernet while also
streaming writes to an AHCI device.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-24 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-21 13:19 [PATCH RESEND v3 0/6] AHCI: Optimize interrupt processing Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-21 13:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 1/6] AHCI: Cleanup checking of multiple MSIs/SLM modes Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-23 20:18   ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-21 13:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 2/6] AHCI: Move host activation code into ahci_host_activate() Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-23 20:22   ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 20:55     ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-21 13:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 3/6] AHCI: Make few function names more descriptive Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-23 20:22   ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-21 13:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 4/6] AHCI: Get rid of redundant arg to ahci_handle_port_interrupt() Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-21 13:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] AHCI: Optimize single IRQ interrupt processing Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-23 20:57   ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-24 10:42     ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-24 13:04       ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-24 13:27         ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2014-09-24 13:36           ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-24 14:08         ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-24 14:39           ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-24 14:59             ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-25  3:27               ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-01 15:31             ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-10-01 15:39               ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-10-05  2:23               ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-05 16:16                 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-06  7:27                   ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-10-06 12:58                     ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-06 13:24                       ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-10-06 14:54                         ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-25  3:00         ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-09-21 13:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 6/6] AHCI: Do not read HOST_IRQ_STAT reg in multi-MSI mode Alexander Gordeev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140924082713.7ddd718e@as \
    --to=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).