From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, prarit@redhat.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
srostedt@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH V2] X86/CPU: Avoid 100ms sleep for cpu offline during S3
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:00:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140924130019.GA3277@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54211EB6.3020306@intel.com>
* Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> wrote:
> On 2014年08月26日 15:43, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> > With some bad kernel configures, cpu offline consumes more than 100ms
> > during S3. This because native_cpu_die() would fall into 100ms
> > sleep when cpu idle loop thread marked cpu state to DEAD slower. It's
> > timing related issue. What native_cpu_die() does is that poll cpu
> > state and wait for 100ms if cpu state hasn't been marked to DEAD.
> > The 100ms sleep doesn't make sense. To avoid such long sleep, this
> > patch is to add struct completion to each cpu, wait for the completion
> > in the native_cpu_die() and wakeup the completion when the cpu state is
> > marked to DEAD.
> >
> > Tested on the Intel Xeon server with 48 cores, Ivbridge and Haswell laptops.
> > the times of cpu offline on these machines are reduced from more than 100ms
> > to less than 5ms. The system suspend time reduces 2.3s on the servers.
> >
> > Borislav and Prarit also helped to test the patch on an AMD machine and
> > a few systems of various sizes and configurations (multi-socket,
> > single-socket, no hyper threading, etc.). No issues seen.
> >
> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> > Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Hi HPA, Ingo, Thomas & Peter Z:
> Is this patch ok for you?
Nice patch!
I cleaned up a few small details and will push it out if it
passes testing.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-24 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 7:43 [Resend PATCH V2] X86/CPU: Avoid 100ms sleep for cpu offline during S3 Lan Tianyu
2014-09-23 7:18 ` Lan Tianyu
2014-09-24 13:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-09-24 15:01 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/smpboot: Speed up suspend/ resume by avoiding 100ms sleep for CPU " tip-bot for Lan Tianyu
2014-10-19 9:49 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Move data structure to its primary usage scope tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140924130019.GA3277@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox