* [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately
2014-09-25 15:41 [PATCH v4 0/3] mfd: viperboard: fix cache line sharing and cleanups Octavian Purdila
@ 2014-09-25 15:41 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-09-25 15:52 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mfd: viperboard: switch to devm_ allocation Octavian Purdila
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2014-09-25 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sameo, lee.jones; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-usb, johan, Octavian Purdila
Currently the I/O buffer is allocated part of the device status
structure, potentially sharing the same cache line with other members
in this structure.
Allocate the buffer separately, to avoid the I/O operations corrupting
the device status structure due to cache line sharing.
Compiled tested only as I don't have access to hardware.
Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
---
drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
index e00f534..5f62f4e 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
@@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ vb->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (vb->buf == NULL) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
mutex_init(&vb->lock);
vb->usb_dev = usb_get_dev(interface_to_usbdev(interface));
@@ -105,6 +111,7 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
error:
if (vb) {
usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
+ kfree(vb->buf);
kfree(vb);
}
@@ -118,6 +125,7 @@ static void vprbrd_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface)
mfd_remove_devices(&interface->dev);
usb_set_intfdata(interface, NULL);
usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
+ kfree(vb->buf);
kfree(vb);
dev_dbg(&interface->dev, "disconnected\n");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
index 1934528..af928d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct vprbrd_i2c_addr_msg {
struct vprbrd {
struct usb_device *usb_dev; /* the usb device for this device */
struct mutex lock;
- u8 buf[sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg)];
+ u8 *buf;
struct platform_device pdev;
};
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately Octavian Purdila
@ 2014-09-25 15:52 ` Johan Hovold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hovold @ 2014-09-25 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Octavian Purdila; +Cc: sameo, lee.jones, linux-kernel, linux-usb, johan
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:41:35PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> Currently the I/O buffer is allocated part of the device status
> structure, potentially sharing the same cache line with other members
> in this structure.
>
> Allocate the buffer separately, to avoid the I/O operations corrupting
> the device status structure due to cache line sharing.
>
> Compiled tested only as I don't have access to hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> index e00f534..5f62f4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + vb->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (vb->buf == NULL) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> mutex_init(&vb->lock);
>
> vb->usb_dev = usb_get_dev(interface_to_usbdev(interface));
> @@ -105,6 +111,7 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> error:
> if (vb) {
> usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
> + kfree(vb->buf);
> kfree(vb);
> }
>
> @@ -118,6 +125,7 @@ static void vprbrd_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface)
> mfd_remove_devices(&interface->dev);
> usb_set_intfdata(interface, NULL);
> usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
> + kfree(vb->buf);
> kfree(vb);
>
> dev_dbg(&interface->dev, "disconnected\n");
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> index 1934528..af928d0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct vprbrd_i2c_addr_msg {
> struct vprbrd {
> struct usb_device *usb_dev; /* the usb device for this device */
> struct mutex lock;
> - u8 buf[sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg)];
> + u8 *buf;
> struct platform_device pdev;
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/3] mfd: viperboard: switch to devm_ allocation
2014-09-25 15:41 [PATCH v4 0/3] mfd: viperboard: fix cache line sharing and cleanups Octavian Purdila
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately Octavian Purdila
@ 2014-09-25 15:41 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-09-25 15:53 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mfd: viperboard: remove unused platform_device Octavian Purdila
2014-10-09 20:39 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] mfd: viperboard: fix cache line sharing and cleanups Octavian Purdila
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2014-09-25 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sameo, lee.jones; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-usb, johan, Octavian Purdila
Switch to using devm_ allocation to simplify the error path. Also
remove a redundant OOM error message.
Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
---
drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 23 +++++++----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
index 5f62f4e..0d46d05 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
@@ -58,17 +58,14 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
int pipe, ret;
/* allocate memory for our device state and initialize it */
- vb = kzalloc(sizeof(*vb), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (vb == NULL) {
- dev_err(&interface->dev, "Out of memory\n");
+ vb = devm_kzalloc(&interface->dev, sizeof(*vb), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (vb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
- vb->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (vb->buf == NULL) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto error;
- }
+ vb->buf = devm_kzalloc(&interface->dev,
+ sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (vb->buf == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
mutex_init(&vb->lock);
@@ -109,11 +106,7 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
return 0;
error:
- if (vb) {
- usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
- kfree(vb->buf);
- kfree(vb);
- }
+ usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
return ret;
}
@@ -125,8 +118,6 @@ static void vprbrd_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface)
mfd_remove_devices(&interface->dev);
usb_set_intfdata(interface, NULL);
usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
- kfree(vb->buf);
- kfree(vb);
dev_dbg(&interface->dev, "disconnected\n");
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mfd: viperboard: switch to devm_ allocation
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mfd: viperboard: switch to devm_ allocation Octavian Purdila
@ 2014-09-25 15:53 ` Johan Hovold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hovold @ 2014-09-25 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Octavian Purdila; +Cc: sameo, lee.jones, linux-kernel, linux-usb, johan
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:41:36PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> Switch to using devm_ allocation to simplify the error path. Also
> remove a redundant OOM error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 23 +++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> index 5f62f4e..0d46d05 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> @@ -58,17 +58,14 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> int pipe, ret;
>
> /* allocate memory for our device state and initialize it */
> - vb = kzalloc(sizeof(*vb), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (vb == NULL) {
> - dev_err(&interface->dev, "Out of memory\n");
> + vb = devm_kzalloc(&interface->dev, sizeof(*vb), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (vb == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - }
>
> - vb->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (vb->buf == NULL) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error;
> - }
> + vb->buf = devm_kzalloc(&interface->dev,
> + sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (vb->buf == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> mutex_init(&vb->lock);
>
> @@ -109,11 +106,7 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> return 0;
>
> error:
> - if (vb) {
> - usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
> - kfree(vb->buf);
> - kfree(vb);
> - }
> + usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -125,8 +118,6 @@ static void vprbrd_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface)
> mfd_remove_devices(&interface->dev);
> usb_set_intfdata(interface, NULL);
> usb_put_dev(vb->usb_dev);
> - kfree(vb->buf);
> - kfree(vb);
>
> dev_dbg(&interface->dev, "disconnected\n");
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] mfd: viperboard: remove unused platform_device
2014-09-25 15:41 [PATCH v4 0/3] mfd: viperboard: fix cache line sharing and cleanups Octavian Purdila
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately Octavian Purdila
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mfd: viperboard: switch to devm_ allocation Octavian Purdila
@ 2014-09-25 15:41 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-09-25 15:54 ` Johan Hovold
2014-10-09 20:39 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] mfd: viperboard: fix cache line sharing and cleanups Octavian Purdila
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2014-09-25 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sameo, lee.jones; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-usb, johan, Octavian Purdila
Remove pdev field from struct vpbrd as it is not used in the MFD
driver or in any of the sub-drivers.
Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
---
drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 1 -
include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
index 0d46d05..f4dcba6 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
/* save our data pointer in this interface device */
usb_set_intfdata(interface, vb);
- dev_set_drvdata(&vb->pdev.dev, vb);
/* get version information, major first, minor then */
pipe = usb_rcvctrlpipe(vb->usb_dev, 0);
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
index af928d0..afc14ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
@@ -104,7 +104,6 @@ struct vprbrd {
struct usb_device *usb_dev; /* the usb device for this device */
struct mutex lock;
u8 *buf;
- struct platform_device pdev;
};
#endif /* __MFD_VIPERBOARD_H__ */
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mfd: viperboard: remove unused platform_device
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mfd: viperboard: remove unused platform_device Octavian Purdila
@ 2014-09-25 15:54 ` Johan Hovold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hovold @ 2014-09-25 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Octavian Purdila; +Cc: sameo, lee.jones, linux-kernel, linux-usb, johan
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:41:37PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> Remove pdev field from struct vpbrd as it is not used in the MFD
> driver or in any of the sub-drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 1 -
> include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> index 0d46d05..f4dcba6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
>
> /* save our data pointer in this interface device */
> usb_set_intfdata(interface, vb);
> - dev_set_drvdata(&vb->pdev.dev, vb);
>
> /* get version information, major first, minor then */
> pipe = usb_rcvctrlpipe(vb->usb_dev, 0);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> index af928d0..afc14ed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h
> @@ -104,7 +104,6 @@ struct vprbrd {
> struct usb_device *usb_dev; /* the usb device for this device */
> struct mutex lock;
> u8 *buf;
> - struct platform_device pdev;
> };
>
> #endif /* __MFD_VIPERBOARD_H__ */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mfd: viperboard: fix cache line sharing and cleanups
2014-09-25 15:41 [PATCH v4 0/3] mfd: viperboard: fix cache line sharing and cleanups Octavian Purdila
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-25 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mfd: viperboard: remove unused platform_device Octavian Purdila
@ 2014-10-09 20:39 ` Octavian Purdila
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2014-10-09 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones; +Cc: lkml, Samuel Ortiz, linux-usb, Johan Hovold, Octavian Purdila
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Octavian Purdila
<octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote:
> Changes since v3:
>
> * undo a whitespace change
>
> * one more error path cleanup
>
> * add commit body to the last patch
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> * switch to using devm_ allocation
>
> * remove unused platform_device
>
> Changes since v1:
>
> * split cache sharing fix and cleanups into separate patches
>
>
> Octavian Purdila (3):
> mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately
> mfd: viperboard: switch to devm_ allocation
> mfd: viperboard: remove unused platform_device
>
> drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Hi Lee,
Does these look ok now?
Thanks,
Tavi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread