From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the asm-generic tree
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926070022.GA31002@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140926132902.603fb9f8@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1813 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:29:02PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in
> include/asm-generic/io.h between commit 4005bfe0aa45
> ("asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*()") from the
> asm-generic tree and commit 3aad9c969c09 ("asm-generic/io.h: Fix
> ioport_map() for !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP") from the pci tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the only difference is that the latter castes the result
> to void __iomem * - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc include/asm-generic/io.h
> index 3e976be3bdd4,2e2161b0c795..000000000000
> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> @@@ -756,16 -329,11 +756,16 @@@ static inline void iounmap(void __iome
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP
> #ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> +#ifndef ioport_map
> +#define ioport_map ioport_map
> static inline void __iomem *ioport_map(unsigned long port, unsigned int nr)
> {
> - return PCI_IOBASE + (port & IO_SPACE_LIMIT);
> + return (void __iomem *)(PCI_IOBASE + (port & IO_SPACE_LIMIT));
I don't think that cast is necessary. All instances of PCI_IOBASE are
already defined to be void __iomem *.
Or at least they were until a few days ago. Commit f3dfddf7bd85 (ARM:
Define PCI_IOBASE as the base of virtual PCI IO space) introduces one
variant for ARM which isn't actually void __iomem *. I think what we
should do is standardize the type of PCI_IOBASE.
So how about we remove commit 3aad9c969c09 (asm-generic/io.h: Fix
ioport_map() for !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP) and move the cast to void
__iomem * to Liviu's definition of PCI_IOBASE for ARM?
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-26 3:29 linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the asm-generic tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-26 7:00 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-09-26 9:13 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-26 9:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-03 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2018-04-04 18:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140926070022.GA31002@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox