From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754364AbaI2SeE (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:34:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:35961 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752602AbaI2SeB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:34:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:33:57 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Yarygin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Mike Galbraith , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf session: Add option to copy events when queueing Message-ID: <20140929183357.GI3879@kernel.org> References: <1411060059-23589-1-git-send-email-yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1411060059-23589-2-git-send-email-yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140922070410.GA3108@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140922070410.GA3108@krava.brq.redhat.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:04:10AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:07:38PM +0400, Alexander Yarygin wrote: > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c > > @@ -542,7 +542,13 @@ int perf_session_queue_event(struct perf_session *s, union perf_event *event, > > return -ENOMEM; > > new->file_offset = file_offset; > > - new->event = event; > > + if (s->copy_on_queue) { > > + new->event = malloc(event->header.size); > > + memcpy(new->event, event, event->header.size); > we have memdup, and you need to check for allocation failure Right. > hum.. how about allocation limits? > Now have report.queue-size to keep track and limit the ordered_events > memory size. I think we should add this allocation size under this > limit as well. Yup. > > + } else > > + new->event = event; > > + > > also the copy_on_queue flag and the logic above feels more like > it belongs to 'ordered_events' object to me Agreed. - Arnaldo