From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751640AbaI3Pdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:33:45 -0400 Received: from seldrel01.sonyericsson.com ([212.209.106.2]:6789 "EHLO seldrel01.sonyericsson.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750782AbaI3Pdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:33:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:33:54 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Kumar Gala , Mark Brown CC: Rob Herring , Lee Jones , Pawel Moll , Andy Gross , Mark Rutland , Kevin Hilman , Josh Cartwright , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] regulator: qcom-rpm: Regulator driver for the Qualcomm RPM Message-ID: <20140930153353.GO28481@sonymobile.com> References: <1411428329-23172-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <1411428329-23172-4-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <20140924083518.GB4015@sirena.org.uk> <4437DA50-D8BC-4E78-821C-41440A08B9A9@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4437DA50-D8BC-4E78-821C-41440A08B9A9@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 24 Sep 06:50 PDT 2014, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Sep 24, 2014, at 3:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 04:25:29PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >> Driver for regulators exposed by the Resource Power Manager (RPM) found > >> in Qualcomm 8660, 8960 and 8064 based devices. > > > > Applied, thanks. Thanks Mark, sorry for sending this to you so many times. I'll keep the smd rpm regulator separate from the smd series (after the RFC) to reduce the traffic. > > Mark, can you drop this until we see at least an RFC patch for the RPM > support for b-family SoCs (8074, 8084, etc) chips. The regulator could > should either be the same or highly similar for b-family, but until we see > the core RPM driver on the b-family SoCs we will not know that. > As you can see in the smd rpm regulator driver, the protocol for regulator updates are completely different in the two cases. I'm not sure about msm_bus, but the clocks implementation is equivalent, so there's some room for re-use. So I think we're good here. Regards, Bjorn