From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752223AbaI3QeN (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:34:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12194 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146AbaI3QeM (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:34:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:53 +0200 From: Frantisek Hrbata To: Dave Hansen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, kamaleshb@in.ibm.com, hechjie@cn.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dvlasenk@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, hannsj_uhl@de.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap Message-ID: <20140930163353.GC3073@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: Frantisek Hrbata References: <1411990382-11902-1-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com> <1411990382-11902-3-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com> <20140930124121.GB3073@localhost.localdomain> <542ABDE7.7090808@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <542ABDE7.7090808@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:27:51AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 09/30/2014 05:41 AM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote: > > Does it make sense to replace "count" with "size" so it's consistent with the > > rest or do you prefer "nr_bytes" or as Dave proposed "len_bytes"? > > I don't care what it is as long as it has a unit in it. Hi Dave/Thomas, I sent v2 of this patch set, which uses the "len_bytes". Again, I'm sorry I forgot to fix this the first time. Many thanks -- Frantisek Hrbata