From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751553AbaI3VGj (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:06:39 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:36541 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750809AbaI3VGh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:06:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:06:34 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Lennart Poettering , Kay Sievers , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Wu Zhangjin , Takashi Iwai , Arjan van de Ven , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Oleg Nesterov , hare@suse.com, Andrew Morton , Tetsuo Handa , Joseph Salisbury , Benjamin Poirier , Santosh Rastapur , One Thousand Gnomes , Tim Gardner , Pierre Fersing , Nagalakshmi Nandigama , Praveen Krishnamoorthy , Sreekanth Reddy , Abhijit Mahajan , Cas ey Leedom , Hariprasad S , MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, Linux SCSI List , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] kthread: warn on kill signal if not OOM Message-ID: <20140930210634.GC14283@amd> References: <20140905174925.GA12991@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140911202354.GA2598@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20140922194906.GB9868@amd> <2306678.TJaWkZCAc8@dtor-glaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2306678.TJaWkZCAc8@dtor-glaptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 2014-09-22 13:23:54, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Monday, September 22, 2014 09:49:06 PM Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Thu 2014-09-11 13:23:54, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:59:25PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > Yes, but we mostly do this anyway. SCSI for instance does asynchronous > > > > scanning of attached devices (once the cards are probed) > > > > > > What would it do it card was a bit slow to probe? > > > > > > > but has a sync > > > > point for ordering. > > > > > > Quite often we do not really care about ordering of devices. I mean, > > > does it matter if your mouse is discovered before your keyboard or > > > after? > > > > Actually yes, I suspect it does. > > > > I do evtest /dev/input/eventX by hand, occassionaly. It would be > > annoying if they moved between reboots. > > I am sorry but you will have to cope with such annoyances. It' snot like we > fail to boot the box here. > > The systems are now mostly hot-pluggable and userland is supposed to > handle it, and it does, at least for input devices. If you want stable naming > use udev facilities to rename devices as needed or add needed symlinks (by-id, > etc.). Well, it would be nice if udev was not mandatory. Do the sync points for ordering actually cost us something? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html