From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753623AbaJGJO0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 05:14:26 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:57152 "EHLO mail-ig0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753301AbaJGJOX (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 05:14:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:14:17 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Linus Walleij Cc: Pramod Gurav , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Samuel Ortiz , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: remove use of gpiochip_remove() retval Message-ID: <20141007091417.GM25331@lee--X1> References: <1412086542-1662-1-git-send-email-pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> <1412086542-1662-2-git-send-email-pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav > wrote: > > > Get rid of using return value from gpiochip_remove() as it returns > > void. > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz > > CC: Lee Jones > > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav > > Already fixed in the GPIO tree. What does that mean? That it doesn't need fixing here? If this patch still needs applying it will carry more weight with your Ack. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog