linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: i915.ko WC writes are slow after ea8596bb2d8d379
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 05:10:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141008051059.65566251@as> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141008090336.GD12897@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>

On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:03:36 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> 
> I ran into a problem on a Sandybridge i5-2500s whilst measuring the
> performance of GTT write-combining access. I found subsequent runs were
> about 10-40x slower than the first. For example,
> 
> igt/gem_gtt_speed:
> 
> Time to read 16k through a GTT map:             325.285µs
> Time to write 16k through a GTT map:              4.729µs
> Time to clear 16k through a GTT map:              4.584µs
> Time to clear 16k through a cached GTT map:       1.342µs
> 
> on the second run became:
> 
> Time to read 16k through a GTT map:             332.148µs
> Time to write 16k through a GTT map:            209.411µs
> Time to clear 16k through a GTT map:             56.460µs
> Time to clear 16k through a cached GTT map:      50.897µs
> 
> Naively I would say that we lost the wc on our ioremap.
> /sys/kernel/debug/x86/pat_memtype_list remained the same across repeated
> runs.
> 
> A bisection pointed to 
> 
> commit ea8596bb2d8d37957f3e92db9511c50801689180
> Author: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Date:   Thu Jul 18 20:47:53 2013 +0900
> 
>     kprobes/x86: Remove unused text_poke_smp() and text_poke_smp_batch() functions
> 
> of which the active ingredient was just
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index b32ebf9..f4001e0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -2334,7 +2334,6 @@ config HAVE_ATOMIC_IOMAP
>  
>  config HAVE_TEXT_POKE_SMP
>         bool
> -       select STOP_MACHINE if SMP
>  
>  config X86_DEV_DMA_OPS
>         bool
> 
> and adding that back into the current build, e.g.

Hmm, set_mtrr() uses stop_machine(). I wonder if your MTRRs are out of
sync and your results depend on which CPU the test runs on?

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 3632743..48a8a69 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ config X86
>         select HAVE_USER_RETURN_NOTIFIER
>         select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_RANDOMIZE_PIE
>         select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> +       select STOP_MACHINE
>         select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
>         select SPARSE_IRQ
>         select GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT
> 
> fixes the regression.
> 
> For the record, this kernel build doesn't use modules, which seems relevant
> in light of ea8596bb2 "fixes a Kconfig dependency issue on STOP_MACHINE
> in the case of CONFIG_SMP && !CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD".

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-08 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-08  9:03 i915.ko WC writes are slow after ea8596bb2d8d379 Chris Wilson
2014-10-08 10:10 ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2014-10-08 19:49   ` Chris Wilson
2014-10-08 21:36     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-09  6:53       ` Chris Wilson
2014-10-09 12:44         ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-10-09 13:00           ` Chris Wilson
2014-10-09 14:46             ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-10-09 15:14               ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-18 14:48   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-18 15:57     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-19  8:14       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-19 10:03         ` [PATCH] kernel: Remove stop_machine() Kconfig dependency Chris Wilson
2015-11-19  8:16     ` i915.ko WC writes are slow after ea8596bb2d8d379 Ingo Molnar
2014-10-08 17:47 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-10-09  1:45   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141008051059.65566251@as \
    --to=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).