From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756311AbaJHN1Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:27:16 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45759 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754201AbaJHN1O (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:27:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:26:15 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Roger Quadros Cc: Oussama Ghorbel , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Rabin Vincent , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] phy: omap-usb2: Enable runtime PM of omap-usb2 phy properly Message-ID: <20141008132615.GA5119@kroah.com> References: <20141006194418.GA399@debian> <1412679771-8293-1-git-send-email-ghorbel@pivasoftware.com> <5434F336.4040908@ti.com> <543517F9.9070109@pivasoftware.com> <54352340.3050900@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54352340.3050900@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:42:56PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > Oussama, > > On 10/08/2014 01:54 PM, Oussama Ghorbel wrote: > > Hi Roger, > > > > Should I resend this v2 version of the patch to stable@vger.kernel.org which is suitable for v3.17 and which will require a very tiny adaptation? > > Or I should resend the first version of this patch which is suitable for 3.16 but might seems confusing a little sine I'm resend the outdated version. > > If it is a trivial conflict then I think you can just send the patch > which applies to the most recent kernel. > Greg can clarify if I'm wrong as he maintains the stable trees. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to submit patches to the stable trees. Note, it has to be in Linus's tree _first_ before you ever worry about the stable trees. Do that first please. thanks, greg k-h