From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: block: fix alignment_offset math that assumes io_min is a power-of-2
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:41:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141008224149.GB15590@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5435BCD5.9050306@kernel.dk>
On Wed, Oct 08 2014 at 6:38pm -0400,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> On 10/08/2014 04:28 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08 2014 at 6:12pm -0400,
> > Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/08/2014 04:05 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>> The math in both blk_stack_limits() and queue_limit_alignment_offset()
> >>> assume that a block device's io_min (aka minimum_io_size) is always a
> >>> power-of-2. Fix the math such that it works for non-power-of-2 io_min.
> >>>
> >>> This issue (of alignment_offset != 0) became apparent when testing
> >>> dm-thinp with a thinp blocksize that matches a RAID6 stripesize of
> >>> 1280K. Commit fdfb4c8c1 ("dm thin: set minimum_io_size to pool's data
> >>> block size") unlocked the potential for alignment_offset != 0 due to
> >>> the dm-thin-pool's io_min possibly being a non-power-of-2.
> >>
> >> Well that sucks, AND with a mask is considerably cheaper than a MOD...
> >
> > Yeah, certainly does suck (please note v2 that I just sent). The MODs
> > shouldn't kill us, these functions aren't called in any real hot path.
> > A storm at boot maybe.. or SCSI rescan but...
>
> I had it mixed up with the recent blk_max_size_offset() - you are right,
> this is not in a hot path. For that case, I don't really care, it's fine.
>
> Is v2 runtime tested?
Yes.
Here is the DM stack for an lvm created dm-thin-pool (dm-5).
# lsblk /dev/skd0
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
skd0 252:0 0 745.3G 0 disk
├─bricks-mypool_tmeta 253:2 0 15.8G 0 lvm
│ └─bricks-mypool-tpool 253:4 0 512G 0 lvm
│ └─bricks-mypool 253:5 0 512G 0 lvm
└─bricks-mypool_tdata 253:3 0 512G 0 lvm
└─bricks-mypool-tpool 253:4 0 512G 0 lvm
└─bricks-mypool 253:5 0 512G 0 lvm
Before patch:
# cat /sys/block/dm-5/alignment_offset
1048576
After patch:
# cat /sys/block/dm-5/alignment_offset
0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 22:05 [PATCH] block: fix alignment_offset math that assumes io_min is a power-of-2 Mike Snitzer
2014-10-08 22:12 ` Jens Axboe
2014-10-08 22:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-10-08 22:38 ` Jens Axboe
2014-10-08 22:41 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141008224149.GB15590@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox