From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 16:24:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141012142455.GC21479@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141012055146.GA1310@katana>
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 07:51:46AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed,
> > but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it
> > is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on.
>
> OK, that is a clear statement.
>
> So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing
> unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise?
Helpful, please do it. I can take it all through my driver-core tree if
you want, that might make things easier for others.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-12 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-10 7:24 [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 7:54 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2014-10-10 18:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 18:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 8:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 18:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 19:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-11 16:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-11 17:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-11 20:55 ` Greg KH
2014-10-12 5:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-12 14:24 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-10-12 17:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-10 21:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141012142455.GC21479@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox