From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WTF is d_add_ci() doing with negative dentries?
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 03:14:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141013021459.GW7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <318CCEE2-9EBE-4696-8DE9-7297CDCE207D@cam.ac.uk>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:56:11AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> I am just wondering whether there might be error conditions in which we might end up with a (perhaps invalid) negative dentry in memory which could be found here? Probably not a problem especially now that d_invalidate() cannot fail any more.
Huh? Failing d_invalidate() on _negative_ dentry is flat-out impossible;
it would be dropped just fine, and we wouldn't have found it in the first
place. Check what it used to do all way back to 2.2.0:
if (dentry->d_count) {
if (dentry->d_inode && S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
return -EBUSY;
}
So unless you care about 2.1.something (2.0 didn't have dcache at all),
this scenario isn't possible.
In any case, d_add_ci() users that might have negative dentries become
positive cannot afford hashed negative dentries at all - at the very
least they need to treat them as invalid in ->d_revalidate() in such
situations. Exactly because having a hashed valid negative dentry for
FuBaR after e.g. mkdir fubar will really hurt - mkdir won't have any way
to know that old dentry was there; there was no variant of fubar in directory
prior to that mkdir (FuBaR _was_ negative) and there's nothing to suggest
looking for it. So it won't be noticed and it'll bloody well stay negative
and hashed. I.e. stat FuBaR; mkdir fubar; stat FuBaR will have the second
stat find dentry still hashed and valid negative.
You can get away with that if you store something like timestamp[1] of
the parent directory in those negative dentries and check that in
->d_revalidate(). But that will work just fine, since d_add_ci() is
serialized by ->i_mutex held on parent and whatever it was that added your
"exact spelling" into directory has made all preexisting negative dentries
invalid...
[1] for arbitrary values of time - e.g.
on positive lookup set ->d_time to 0
on negative lookup set ->d_time to that of parent dentry
on mkdir set ->d_time to 0
on unlink, rmdir and rename victim copy ->d_time from parent dentry
on any directory modification bump its ->d_time
on d_revalidate of negative dentry compare ->d_time with that of parent
dentry and declare invalid on mismatch
will do just fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-13 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-12 22:18 WTF is d_add_ci() doing with negative dentries? Al Viro
2014-10-12 23:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2014-10-13 2:14 ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-10-13 9:16 ` Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141013021459.GW7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox