public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
Cc: lidza.louina@gmail.com, markh@compro.net,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgap: re-arrange functions for removing forward declarations.
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:25:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141013032544.GA26646@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141013023425.GA15452@devel>

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:34:25AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> Re-arrange the functions for removing forward declarations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch has too many changes for re-arranging the functions.
> So I wonder that I should break this up into smaller patches.

Are the .o files identical before and after this patch?  If so, it's
fine.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-13  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-13  2:34 [PATCH] staging: dgap: re-arrange functions for removing forward declarations Daeseok Youn
2014-10-13  3:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-10-13  8:01   ` DaeSeok Youn
2014-10-13 14:56     ` Joe Perches
2014-10-13 23:44       ` DaeSeok Youn
2014-10-14  2:04       ` Greg KH
2014-10-14  2:19         ` Joe Perches
2014-10-14 11:10           ` DaeSeok Youn
2014-10-14 13:04           ` Dan Carpenter
     [not found]       ` <1441864556.1190074.1413252337243.JavaMail.root@mx2.compro.net>
2014-10-14 12:01         ` Mark Hounschell
     [not found]         ` <1480715134.1194532.1413288717130.JavaMail.root@mx2.compro.net>
2014-10-21 18:00           ` Mark Hounschell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141013032544.GA26646@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=daeseok.youn@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=lidza.louina@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markh@compro.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox