From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Shao <huishao@microsoft.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@aepfle.de" <olaf@aepfle.de>,
"apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hyperv: Implement Time Synchronization using host time sample
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:25:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141014132551.GB5994@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CD2CABCB2C0A0D4682C5F8AD840141540BFD41@HKXPRD3002MB006.064d.mgd.msft.net>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 01:04:35PM +0000, Thomas Shao wrote:
> > I really don't see the need for this. We have NTP. If the guests want to, they
> > may use it. Otherwise, they have a free running clock, just like real machines.
> >
> Sometimes the user can't setup NTP. For example the guest OS didn't have network
> connection. And in some cases, they may want the guest time sync with host.
> With the existing hyper-v time source, the system clock will has around 1.5 second
> time drift per day. If the workload in the host is heavy, the number could be larger.
> So this feature is really useful for some scenarios.
Any real machine without networking (and without GPS etc) will
drift. That is just life, tough as it is. Why should we treat these
guests any differently than real machines?
Furthermore, without networking you really don't have a compelling
need for correct absolute time in the first place.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-14 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-14 11:11 [PATCH 2/2] hyperv: Implement Time Synchronization using host time sample Thomas Shao
2014-10-14 11:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-10-14 12:50 ` Thomas Shao
2014-10-14 13:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-10-14 13:13 ` Thomas Shao
2014-10-14 13:16 ` Mike Surcouf
2014-10-14 14:00 ` Thomas Shao
2014-10-14 16:46 ` Mike Surcouf
2014-10-14 14:21 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-14 13:43 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-14 11:54 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-14 13:04 ` Thomas Shao
2014-10-14 13:19 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-14 14:08 ` Thomas Shao
2014-10-14 13:25 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2014-10-14 14:12 ` Thomas Shao
2014-10-14 14:14 ` Mike Surcouf
2014-10-14 14:33 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-14 15:00 ` Victor Miasnikov
2014-10-14 16:30 ` Richard Cochran
2014-10-14 14:25 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141014132551.GB5994@localhost.localdomain \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huishao@microsoft.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox