From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the x86 specializations of atomic_[set|clear]_mask
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:24:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141016202410.GL7369@worktop.fdxtended.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+C-WL-EKxA-oZ815vG9jau76BwQvAuL5WiuE-YvddgWPzt-Ew@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:49:43PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2014 4:02 AM, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:38:01PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > This patch fixes a number of issues with these specializations:
> > >
> > > 1. The memory operand inside the asm specification is erroneously
> > > declared read-only instead of read-write.
> > >
> > > 2. There is no reason to require the 1st operand of andl/orl to be
> > > inside a register; the 1st operand could also be an immediate operand.
> > > So change its specification from "r" to "ir".
> > >
> > > 3. Since addr is supposed to be an atomic_t *, the memory operand
> > > should be addr->counter and not *addr.
> > >
> > > 4. These specializations should be inline functions instead of macros.
> > >
> > > 5. Finally, the "memory" clobbers are unnecessary, so they should be
> > > removed. (This is in line with the other atomic functions such as
> > > atomic_add and atomic_sub, the likes of which do not have a "memory"
> > > clobber.)
> >
> > No real problem with this, but I'm going to kill off these functions
> > when I get a little time :)
>
> Hmm why's that?
because they're odd (inconsistent with the rest of the atomic
interfaces) and not implemented by all archs.
See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/6/196
3.18 will include up to 4/5 of that series and when I get a spare moment
I need cleanup/post the next arch sweep that will get us that 5/5 thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-15 20:38 [PATCH] Fix the x86 specializations of atomic_[set|clear]_mask Patrick Palka
2014-10-16 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CA+C-WL-EKxA-oZ815vG9jau76BwQvAuL5WiuE-YvddgWPzt-Ew@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-16 20:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-17 0:19 ` Patrick Palka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141016202410.GL7369@worktop.fdxtended.com \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox