public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjt@google.com,
	bsegall@google.com, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	alan.cox@intel.com, mark.gross@intel.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/3 v5] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:56:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141021145652.GB23531@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412907717-2871-3-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:21:56AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
>  static inline long calc_tg_weight(struct task_group *tg, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> -	long tg_weight;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Use this CPU's actual weight instead of the last load_contribution
> -	 * to gain a more accurate current total weight. See
> -	 * update_cfs_rq_load_contribution().
> -	 */
> -	tg_weight = atomic_long_read(&tg->load_avg);
> -	tg_weight -= cfs_rq->tg_load_contrib;
> -	tg_weight += cfs_rq->load.weight;
> -
> -	return tg_weight;
> +	return atomic_long_read(&tg->load_avg);

Since you're now also delaying updating load_avg, why not retain this
slightly better approximation?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-21 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-10  2:21 [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v5] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Yuyang Du
2014-10-10  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/3 v5] sched: Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-10-22  0:23   ` Yuyang Du
2014-10-10  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/3 v5] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Yuyang Du
2014-10-21 14:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-21 23:33     ` Yuyang Du
2014-10-21 14:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-21 23:39     ` Yuyang Du
2014-10-21 14:56   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-22  0:13     ` Yuyang Du
2014-10-22 10:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-22 10:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-23 11:06   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-10-23 11:06   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-10-24  1:49     ` Yuyang Du
2014-10-10  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH 3/3 v5] sched: Remove task and group entity load_avg when they are dead Yuyang Du
2014-10-22 10:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-10 10:25 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v5] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141021145652.GB23531@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox