From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Wise <pabs3@bonedaddy.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: terminate strings also on \r
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:00:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141022190051.7c0d5df1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5j+sW89tZDA5GQnkL4E9wHTScftyxUhyAjbWnEfxGocBjg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:43:10 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:21:37 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Paul Wise <pabs3@bonedaddy.net>
> >>
> >> This partially mitigates a common strategy used by attackers for hiding
> >> the full contents of strings in procfs from naive sysadmins who use cat,
> >> more or sysctl to inspect the contents of strings in procfs.
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> >> @@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ static int _proc_do_string(char *data, int maxlen, int write,
> >> while ((p - buffer) < *lenp && len < maxlen - 1) {
> >> if (get_user(c, p++))
> >> return -EFAULT;
> >> - if (c == 0 || c == '\n')
> >> + if (c == 0 || c == '\n' || c == '\r')
> >> break;
> >> data[len++] = c;
> >> }
> >
> > There are no valid uses of \r in a procfs write?
>
> I struggle to imagine one; everything I found that uses proc_dostring
> seems to be names, paths, and commands.
>
You're insufficiently pessimistic.
I wonder if the chances of damage would be lower if we were to continue
to accept the \r, but turn it into something else ("\r"?) when it is
read.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 20:21 [PATCH] sysctl: terminate strings also on \r Kees Cook
2014-10-22 10:03 ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-10-22 13:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-10-22 22:49 ` David Rientjes
2014-10-22 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2014-10-23 2:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-10-23 16:39 ` Kees Cook
2014-10-23 18:23 ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-23 18:50 ` Kees Cook
2014-10-27 9:56 ` Pavel Machek
2014-10-27 10:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-10-27 12:01 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141022190051.7c0d5df1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pabs3@bonedaddy.net \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox