From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
jolsa@redhat.com, rfowles@redhat.com
Subject: Re: perf: Translating mmap2 ids into socket info?
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:02:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141022200219.GM21513@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5447F2DF.3000506@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:09:35PM -0400, Joe Mario wrote:
> >Yes, kernel memory is directly addresses, you basically have a static
> >address->node mapping, it never changes.
>
> For kernel addresses, is there a reason not to have it available in perf,
> especially when that knowledge is important to understanding a numa-related slowdown?
Dunno why that isn't exposed in sysfs.
> In our case, when we booted with one configuration, AIM ran fine. When we
> booted another way, AIM's performance dropped 50%. It was all due to the dentry
> lock being located on a different (now remote) numa node.
>
> We used your dmesg approach to track down the home node in an attempt to understand
> what was different between the two boots. But the problem would have been obvious
> if perf simply listed the home node info.
Or if you'd used more counters that track the node interconnect traffic
;-) There are a few simple ones that count local/remote type things
(offcore), but using the uncore counters you can track way more.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-22 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-22 16:20 perf: Translating mmap2 ids into socket info? Don Zickus
2014-10-22 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-22 17:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-10-22 18:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-10-22 19:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-22 19:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-22 18:09 ` Joe Mario
2014-10-22 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-22 20:38 ` Don Zickus
2014-10-23 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-23 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-23 13:10 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141022200219.GM21513@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jmario@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rfowles@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox