public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: GPIO bindings guidelines (Was: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] gpio: Support for unified device properties interface)
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:34:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141024073436.GN1484@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581499.2RkCnyfbq6@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:51:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> OK, let's try to take that a bit farther. :-)
> 
> With the (untested) patch below applied (which is a replacement for the one
> sent previously), the driver can use static tables like these:
> 
> static struct acpi_gpio_params reset_gpios = { 0, 0, false };
> statuc struct acpi_gpio_params shutdown_gpios = { 1, 0, false };
> 
> static struct acpi_gpio_mapping my_gpio_mapping[] = {
> 	{ "reset-gpios", &reset_gpios, 1 },
> 	{ "shutdown-gpios", &shutdown_gpios, 1 },
> 	NULL,
> };
> 

This is even better :-)

I tried this with few changes:

 - constify the mapping parameter
 - check for NULL adev->driver_gpios in acpi_get_driver_gpio_data()
 - check for gm->name instead of gm in acpi_get_driver_gpio_data()

It works just fine. For reference here are my changes to rkill-gpio.c:

diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
index 0f62326c0f5e..ec8f5ac53520 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
@@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ static const struct rfkill_ops rfkill_gpio_ops = {
 	.set_block = rfkill_gpio_set_power,
 };
 
+static const struct acpi_gpio_params reset_gpios = { 0, 0, false };
+static const struct acpi_gpio_params shutdown_gpios = { 1, 0, false };
+
+static const struct acpi_gpio_mapping acpi_rfkill_default_gpios[] = {
+	{ "reset-gpios", &reset_gpios, 1 },
+	{ "shutdown-gpios", &shutdown_gpios, 1 },
+	{ },
+};
+
 static int rfkill_gpio_acpi_probe(struct device *dev,
 				  struct rfkill_gpio_data *rfkill)
 {
@@ -75,7 +84,8 @@ static int rfkill_gpio_acpi_probe(struct device *dev,
 	rfkill->name = dev_name(dev);
 	rfkill->type = (unsigned)id->driver_data;
 
-	return 0;
+	return acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios(ACPI_COMPANION(dev),
+					 acpi_rfkill_default_gpios);
 }
 
 static int rfkill_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -110,7 +120,7 @@ static int rfkill_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		rfkill->reset_gpio = gpio;
 	}
 
-	gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "shutdown", 1);
+	gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, "shutdown", 0);
 	if (!IS_ERR(gpio)) {
 		ret = gpiod_direction_output(gpio, 0);
 		if (ret)
@@ -150,6 +160,8 @@ static int rfkill_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	rfkill_unregister(rfkill->rfkill_dev);
 	rfkill_destroy(rfkill->rfkill_dev);
 
+	acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios(ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev));
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
And here are the changes on top of your patch:

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index 691501b53c5e..4151cd774f2f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ void acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 }
 
 int acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios(struct acpi_device *adev,
-			      struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gpios)
+			      const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gpios)
 {
 	if (adev && gpios) {
 		adev->driver_gpios = gpios;
@@ -302,11 +302,14 @@ static bool acpi_get_driver_gpio_data(struct acpi_device *adev,
 				      const char *name, int index,
 				      struct acpi_reference_args *args)
 {
-	struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gm;
+	const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gm;
 
-	for (gm = adev->driver_gpios; gm; gm++)
+	if (!adev->driver_gpios)
+		return false;
+
+	for (gm = adev->driver_gpios; gm->name; gm++)
 		if (!strcmp(name, gm->name) && gm->data && index < gm->size) {
-			struct acpi_gpio_params *par = gm->data + index;
+			const struct acpi_gpio_params *par = gm->data + index;
 
 			args->adev = adev;
 			args->args[0] = par->crs_entry_index;
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 2de7a2614c61..98d992062270 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ struct acpi_device {
 	struct acpi_scan_handler *handler;
 	struct acpi_hotplug_context *hp;
 	struct acpi_driver *driver;
-	struct acpi_gpio_mapping *driver_gpios;
+	const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *driver_gpios;
 	void *driver_data;
 	struct device dev;
 	unsigned int physical_node_count;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 26b7a639f4b9..23f9c55d0331 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -680,13 +680,13 @@ struct acpi_gpio_params {
 
 struct acpi_gpio_mapping {
 	const char *name;
-	struct acpi_gpio_params *data;
+	const struct acpi_gpio_params *data;
 	unsigned int size;
 };
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
 int acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios(struct acpi_device *adev,
-			      struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gpios);
+			      const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gpios);
 
 static inline void acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios(struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static inline void acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios(struct acpi_device *adev)
 }
 #else
 static inline int acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios(struct acpi_device *adev,
-			      struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gpios)
+			      const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gpios)
 {
 	return -ENXIO;
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-24  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-21  5:14 GPIO bindings guidelines (Was: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] gpio: Support for unified device properties interface) Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-21  7:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-22  8:10   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-22  8:33     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-22  8:51       ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-22  9:28         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-22 14:07           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-22 14:56             ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-22 23:21               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-23 12:56                 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-23 21:51                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-24  7:15                     ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-24  7:34                     ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2014-10-24 22:00                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-24 22:05                         ` [PATCH] ACPI / GPIO: Driver GPIO mappings for ACPI GPIOs Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-27  5:21                           ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-27 22:34                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-28  4:11                               ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-30  0:45                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-30 10:22                                   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-11-03 13:22                           ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-03 22:56                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-14  8:58                               ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-14 22:54                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-17  4:28                                 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-11-17 23:31                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-27  7:50                         ` GPIO bindings guidelines (Was: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] gpio: Support for unified device properties interface) Mika Westerberg
2014-10-23  6:10             ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-23 12:08               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-23  6:02   ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-23 12:25     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-30 15:11       ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141024073436.GN1484@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox