From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753323AbaJ1ROO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:14:14 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:57202 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751099AbaJ1RON (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:14:13 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:14:09 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] docg3: Fix miuse of seq_printf return value
Message-ID: <20141028171409.GH1193@ld-irv-0074>
References: <20140929124246.3e39dac8@gandalf.local.home>
 <cover.1412031505.git.joe@perches.com>
 <c1a1138f1b05e87a3fbd8737af2f2c0be6e2724b.1412031505.git.joe@perches.com>
 <20141022082916.GD16128@brian-ubuntu>
 <20141028111301.22481f2a@gandalf.local.home>
 <1414511877.6643.12.camel@perches.com>
 <20141028120552.63c2324c@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141028120552.63c2324c@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:05:52PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:57:57 -0700
> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 11:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I'm going to be working on changes to remove the return value of
> > > seq_printf() and friends.
> > 
> > I'm sure you know all of this, but for anyone else:
> > 
> > This doesn't need to be done in a single pass.
> 
> Yeah, I took a look at all the places, and I've decided to take it off
> in chunks. I'm starting with the ones you posted, and will try to get
> acks for them. And then go after other chunks as I have time.

I'll keep this in my tree as-is for now. Let me know if you still need
something changed. I can give my 'Ack' if you really want to pull this
into a separate branch.

BTW, I just noticed the $subject has a typo: s/miuse/misuse/

Brian