linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:57:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141028185756.GD10873@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141012125515.GA32045@jig.fritz.box>

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:55:15PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:

...

> There's a lengthy comment in arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c that mentions
> the duplication of pgd entries -- and therefore whole hierarchies --
> between trampoline_pgd and init_level4_pgt. And, ironically, that
> comment is yours from earlier this year. Looks like you forgot about
> that in the meantime ;)

Absolutely - you can see how crazy I am about UEFI :-)

Ok, thanks for refreshing this for me, your patch is good, so

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

What this whole story shows, however, is that the EFI mappings are in
fact in the kernel page table and this shouldn't be IMO - I'd like to
very much have them split because otherwise there's no need to switch
page tables at all. And besides, having UEFI in its own address space is
a good thing in itself anyway.

So, I've already hacked up something to have a completely separate EFI
page table - need to find out why it doesn't work yet but qemu was
b0rked until recently so we had to deal with that first... bla bla.

Thanks :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-21 15:26 [PATCHv2 0/3] x86, ptdump: a EFI related fix + enhancements Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services Mathias Krause
2014-10-03 13:47   ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-07 15:01     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-07 17:07       ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-08 15:17         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-08 21:58           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-08 22:26             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-12 12:55               ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 18:57                 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-10-28 19:48                   ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 20:13                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-28 21:14                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 21:26                         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-28 21:49                           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 22:07                             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-29  8:06                               ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-29 14:20                         ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 15:19                           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-29 14:22                     ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 15:22                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-11-11 21:59                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-11-11 22:32                         ` Matt Fleming
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] x86, ptdump: Simplify page flag evaluation code Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 19:49   ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-09-21 20:33     ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-24  7:45       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-25 19:27         ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-26  9:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-26 10:11             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-26 11:15               ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-26 12:35             ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] x86, ptdump: Take parent page flags into account Mathias Krause

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141028185756.GD10873@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).