* [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: lustre: Minor lnet module cleanup @ 2014-10-25 1:30 Mariusz Gorski 2014-10-25 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: lustre: Reduce function visibility Mariusz Gorski 2014-10-25 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: lustre: Use __init and __exit markers for lifecycle functions Mariusz Gorski 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mariusz Gorski @ 2014-10-25 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Peng Tao, devel, linux-kernel These patches fix some sparse warnings and apply __init and __exit markers to module's init and exit functions. v2: Add missing commit sign-offs Mariusz Gorski (2): staging: lustre: Reduce function visibility staging: lustre: Use __init and __exit markers for lifecycle functions drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.1.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: lustre: Reduce function visibility 2014-10-25 1:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: lustre: Minor lnet module cleanup Mariusz Gorski @ 2014-10-25 1:30 ` Mariusz Gorski 2014-10-29 8:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2014-10-25 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: lustre: Use __init and __exit markers for lifecycle functions Mariusz Gorski 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mariusz Gorski @ 2014-10-25 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Peng Tao, devel, linux-kernel This patch fixes the following sparse warnings: drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:47:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_configure' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:67:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_unconfigure' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:87:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_ioctl' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:114:1: warning: symbol 'init_lnet' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:139:1: warning: symbol 'fini_lnet' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski <marius.gorski@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c index e84d59d..dc09b43 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(config_on_load, "configure network at module load"); static struct mutex lnet_config_mutex; -int +static int lnet_configure(void *arg) { /* 'arg' only there so I can be passed to cfs_create_thread() */ @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ lnet_configure(void *arg) return rc; } -int +static int lnet_unconfigure(void) { int refcount; @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ lnet_unconfigure(void) return (refcount == 0) ? 0 : -EBUSY; } -int +static int lnet_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, struct libcfs_ioctl_data *data) { int rc; @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ lnet_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, struct libcfs_ioctl_data *data) DECLARE_IOCTL_HANDLER(lnet_ioctl_handler, lnet_ioctl); -int +static int init_lnet(void) { int rc; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ init_lnet(void) return 0; } -void +static void fini_lnet(void) { int rc; -- 2.1.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: lustre: Reduce function visibility 2014-10-25 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: lustre: Reduce function visibility Mariusz Gorski @ 2014-10-29 8:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2014-10-29 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mariusz Gorski; +Cc: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Peng Tao, devel, linux-kernel On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > This patch fixes the following sparse warnings: > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:47:1: warning: symbol > 'lnet_configure' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:67:1: warning: symbol > 'lnet_unconfigure' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:87:1: warning: symbol > 'lnet_ioctl' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:114:1: warning: symbol > 'init_lnet' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c:139:1: warning: symbol > 'fini_lnet' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski <marius.gorski@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c > index e84d59d..dc09b43 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(config_on_load, "configure network at module load"); > > static struct mutex lnet_config_mutex; > > -int > +static int > lnet_configure(void *arg) > { > /* 'arg' only there so I can be passed to cfs_create_thread() */ > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ lnet_configure(void *arg) > return rc; > } > > -int > +static int > lnet_unconfigure(void) > { > int refcount; > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ lnet_unconfigure(void) > return (refcount == 0) ? 0 : -EBUSY; > } > > -int > +static int > lnet_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, struct libcfs_ioctl_data *data) > { > int rc; > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ lnet_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, struct libcfs_ioctl_data *data) > > DECLARE_IOCTL_HANDLER(lnet_ioctl_handler, lnet_ioctl); > > -int > +static int > init_lnet(void) > { > int rc; > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ init_lnet(void) > return 0; > } > > -void > +static void > fini_lnet(void) > { > int rc; Someone did this patch before you, sorry. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: lustre: Use __init and __exit markers for lifecycle functions 2014-10-25 1:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: lustre: Minor lnet module cleanup Mariusz Gorski 2014-10-25 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: lustre: Reduce function visibility Mariusz Gorski @ 2014-10-25 1:30 ` Mariusz Gorski 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mariusz Gorski @ 2014-10-25 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Peng Tao, devel, linux-kernel Apply __init marker to module's init function and __exit to module's exit function as they both have no other usage. Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski <marius.gorski@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c index dc09b43..3c23677 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/module.c @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ lnet_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, struct libcfs_ioctl_data *data) DECLARE_IOCTL_HANDLER(lnet_ioctl_handler, lnet_ioctl); -static int +static int __init init_lnet(void) { int rc; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ init_lnet(void) return 0; } -static void +static void __exit fini_lnet(void) { int rc; -- 2.1.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-29 15:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-10-25 1:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: lustre: Minor lnet module cleanup Mariusz Gorski 2014-10-25 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: lustre: Reduce function visibility Mariusz Gorski 2014-10-29 8:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2014-10-25 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: lustre: Use __init and __exit markers for lifecycle functions Mariusz Gorski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox