public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static declarations
@ 2014-10-25 19:09 Junien Fridrick
  2014-10-29  8:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Junien Fridrick @ 2014-10-25 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Junien Fridrick, Oleg Drokin, Andreas Dilger, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Peng Tao, Isaac Huang, LABBE Corentin, Doug Oucharek,
	HPDD-discuss, devel

This patch fixes the following sparse warnings :

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routes' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:293:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routers' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_peers' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:660:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_nis' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Junien Fridrick <linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net>
---
This patch is part of task 16 of the Eudyptula challenge
Applies to next-20141023

 drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
index 6e8f7e2..b82914f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int proc_lnet_stats(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 				 __proc_lnet_stats);
 }
 
-int proc_lnet_routes(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
-		     size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+static int proc_lnet_routes(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+		     void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	const int	tmpsiz = 256;
 	char		*tmpstr;
@@ -290,8 +290,8 @@ int proc_lnet_routes(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-int proc_lnet_routers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
-		      size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+static int proc_lnet_routers(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+		      void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	int	rc = 0;
 	char      *tmpstr;
@@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ int proc_lnet_routers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-int proc_lnet_peers(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
-		    size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+static int proc_lnet_peers(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+		    void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	const int		tmpsiz  = 256;
 	struct lnet_peer_table	*ptable;
@@ -657,8 +657,8 @@ static int proc_lnet_buffers(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 				 __proc_lnet_buffers);
 }
 
-int proc_lnet_nis(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer,
-		  size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+static int proc_lnet_nis(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+		  void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	int	tmpsiz = 128 * LNET_CPT_NUMBER;
 	int	rc = 0;
-- 
2.0.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static declarations
  2014-10-25 19:09 [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static declarations Junien Fridrick
@ 2014-10-29  8:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2014-10-29  8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Junien Fridrick
  Cc: linux-kernel, devel, HPDD-discuss, Peng Tao, Andreas Dilger,
	Doug Oucharek, Oleg Drokin, LABBE Corentin, Isaac Huang

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:09:34PM +0000, Junien Fridrick wrote:
> This patch fixes the following sparse warnings :
> 
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routes' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:293:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_peers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:660:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_nis' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Junien Fridrick <linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net>
> ---
> This patch is part of task 16 of the Eudyptula challenge
> Applies to next-20141023
> 
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

This patch fails to apply to my tree, please refresh and try again.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-29 15:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-25 19:09 [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static declarations Junien Fridrick
2014-10-29  8:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox