Re: linux-next: unnecessary merges in the v4l-dvb tree

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1519 bytes --]

Hi Stephen,

Em Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:24:45 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> escreveu:

> Hi Mauro,
> 
> I noticed that you have two unnecessary merges in the v4l-dvb tree
> (git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git#master).  This is not
> entirely your fault.  Unfortunately, when you do
> 
> git merge <signed tag>
> 
> git will produce a merge commit even if it could have fast
> forwarded :-(.  Consequently, you have commits 1ef24960ab78 ("Merge tag
> 'v3.18-rc1' into patchwork") and d6d41ba1cb38 ("Merge remote-tracking
> branch 'linus/master' into patchwork") even though the patchwork branch
> in each case is included in the tag being merged.
> 
> The only ways I know around this is to either merge the commit
> associated with the tag or do a (hard) reset to the tag.

A hard reset to the tag would likely be a bad idea, as it would break
the sub-maintainers trees that are based on my tree.

I generally use "git pull" for that, as the man page says that the
default behavior is to do fast forward:
       "--ff
           When the merge resolves as a fast-forward, only update
	   the branch pointer, without creating a merge commit. 
	   This is the default behavior."

It seems that the man page is then outdated for signed tags, or,
eventually, we need to make --ff explicit on this case.

I'll try the approach of merging the associated commit next time,
but this is something that it is easy to forget.

> 
> Linus, any thoughts?

Regards,
Mauro

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]