From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Auld, Will" <will.auld@intel.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Cache Allocation Technology Design
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:12:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141030171247.GC378@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAAKZwvJOKsrj_yczDGaNLaNYo+_=HzsTLwDdcaTJqO2VMy8uA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 07:58:34AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Another reason unified hierarchy is a bad model.
Things wrong with this message.
1. Top posted. It isn't clear which part you're referring to and this
was pointed out to you multiple times in the past.
2. No real thoughts or technical details. Maybe you had some in your
head but nothing was elaborated. This forces me to guess what you
had on mind when you produced the above sentence and of course me
not being you this takes a considerable amount of brain cycle and
I'd still end up with multiple alternative scenarios that I'll have
to cover.
3. Needlessly loaded expression, which forces me to respond.
Combined, this is just rude and you've been showing this type of
behavior multiple times. Behave yourself.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-16 18:44 Cache Allocation Technology Design vikas
2014-10-20 16:18 ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-24 10:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-28 23:22 ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 12:48 ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 16:32 ` Auld, Will
2014-10-29 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 17:41 ` Vikas Shivappa
2014-10-29 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 7:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-30 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-30 12:44 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-30 15:25 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 12:43 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-30 17:03 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-30 22:22 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 22:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-06 16:27 ` Matt Fleming
2014-11-06 17:20 ` Vikas Shivappa
2014-10-31 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 15:58 ` Tejun Heo
2014-11-04 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-05 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 14:14 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <CAAAKZwvJOKsrj_yczDGaNLaNYo+_=HzsTLwDdcaTJqO2VMy8uA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-30 17:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-10-30 22:35 ` Tim Hockin
2014-10-31 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-30 23:18 ` Vikas Shivappa
2014-11-04 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-06 17:03 ` Matt Fleming
2014-11-10 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 17:26 ` Vikas Shivappa
2014-10-29 18:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-03 23:29 ` Vikas Shivappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141030171247.GC378@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thockin@hockin.org \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox