From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752086AbaKBC3U (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2014 22:29:20 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:39615 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751332AbaKBC3Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2014 22:29:16 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 96.249.243.124 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/GpzC6kgsRg0so6Qg6u1kR3+cCKYarUnY= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan 2B1CD60F56E Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 22:29:05 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Boris BREZILLON Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Alexandre Belloni , Andrew Victor , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: atmel-aic: add RTT irq fixup Message-ID: <20141102022905.GT3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1409735271-15353-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20140914054648.GJ21986@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140915214907.3ec49158@bbrezillon> <20140915215356.4c332acd@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140915215356.4c332acd@bbrezillon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:53:56PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:49:07 +0200 > Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:46:48 -0400 > > Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:07:46AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > > > The series depends on the acceptation of the RTT DT bindings proposed here > > > > [1]. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Boris > > > > > > > > [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/145 > > > > > > Hmm, the bindings, unfortunately, still seem to be in flux. Any update? > > > > Actually, all at91 developers seemed to agree on this binding [2], and > > these changes do not impact the current series. > > > > Anyway, I think it's safer to wait for an official approval before > > taking this series into irqchip/next. Care to resend against v3.18-rc1? thx, Jason.