public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched/deadline: support dl task migrate during cpu hotplug
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 07:57:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141103235747.GA26702@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141103104111.GA23531@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Hi Peter,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:41:11AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 03:28:17PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I observe that dl task can't be migrated to other cpus during cpu hotplug, in 
>> addition, task may/may not be running again if cpu is added back. The root cause 
>> which I found is that dl task will be throtted and removed from dl rq after 
>> comsuming all budget, which leads to stop task can't pick it up from dl rq and 
>> migrate to other cpus during hotplug. 
>> 
>> So I try two methods.
>> 
>> - add throttled dl sched_entity to a throttled_list, the list will be traversed
>>   during cpu hotplug, and the dl sched_entity will be picked and enqueue, then 
>>   stop task will pick and migrate it. However, dl sched_entity is throttled again 
>>   before stop task running since the below path. This path will set rq->online 0 
>>   which lead to set_rq_offline() won't be called in function migration_call().
>> 
>
>This seems wrong to me; this screws around with the CBS by replenishing
>too soon.

Agreed.

>
>> @@ -1593,9 +1602,20 @@ static void rq_online_dl(struct rq *rq)
>>  /* Assumes rq->lock is held */
>>  static void rq_offline_dl(struct rq *rq)
>>  {
>> +	struct task_struct *p, *n;
>> +
>>  	if (rq->dl.overloaded)
>>  		dl_clear_overload(rq);
>>  
>> +	/* Make sched_dl_entity available for pick_next_task() */
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &rq->dl.throttled_list, dl.throttled_node) {
>> +		p->dl.dl_throttled = 0;
>> +		hrtimer_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
>> +		p->dl.dl_runtime = p->dl.dl_runtime;
>> +		if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
>> +			enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	cpudl_set(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu, 0, 0);
>>  }
>
>
>So what is wrong with making dl_task_timer() deal with it? The timer
>will still fire on the correct time, canceling it and or otherwise
>messing with the CBS is wrong. Once it fires, all we need to do is
>migrate it to another cpu (preferably one that is still online of course
>:-).

Do you mean what I need to do is push the task to another cpu in dl_task_timer() 
if rq is offline? In addition, what will happen if dl task can't preempt on 
another cpu?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-04  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1414740497-7232-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <1414747229.8574.99.camel@tkhai>
2014-11-03  2:03   ` [PATCH RFC] sched/deadline: support dl task migrate during cpu hotplug Wanpeng Li
     [not found] ` <5453759F.5020803@arm.com>
2014-11-03  2:16   ` Wanpeng Li
     [not found] ` <20141103104111.GA23531@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2014-11-03 23:57   ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2014-11-04  8:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-04  8:23       ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04  9:20         ` Juri Lelli
2014-11-04 10:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-04 10:51           ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 13:30           ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 13:33             ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 15:46             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-04 15:50               ` Juri Lelli
2014-11-05  6:24                 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-31 23:21 Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141103235747.GA26702@kernel \
    --to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox